📅 Date
ℹ About
The fourth network meeting of the NFDI consortia in the Berlin-Brandenburg region.
To signal your intent to participate, please click on the "+" in the "Planned attendants" section and follow the instructions (your ORCID credentials will be required).
Roles:
(none)
Admins
(none)
Planned attendants
(none)
Participants
Observers
(none)
💬 Messages
| text | link | user | date | np |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
The 5th NFDI Berlin-Brandenburg network meeting will take place on 2 March 2027 from 10-16 CET in (or near) Berlin. The event organization will be led by MaRDI and NFDIxCS, and your input is welcome.
Updates about the planning of the event will be shared via the NFDI-BB mailing list.
|
2026-05-19T23:02:48.797Z
| |||
|
A static version of this page - from after the event - has been archived at Zenodo.
|
2026-05-19T22:56:32.847Z
| |||
|
Slides from today's presentations will be made available in the Zenodo community "NFDI Berlin-Brandenburg".
|
2026-05-19T22:52:01.076Z
| |||
|
According to the Mentimeter, there were 40 participants.
|
2026-05-19T09:28:34.279Z
| |||
|
The slides for the pitch "Code execution as part of peer review also works for your favourite journal or conference - the CODECHECK initiative, its principles and workflows" are available on Zenodo - see link - and general information is on the project website - see link.
|
2026-05-19T09:28:15.821Z
| |||
|
Key aspects that were discussed at Reproducibility Table R4: (a) roles within the research process (e.g. human vs. LLM, statistician vs. data steward vs. research software engineer), (b) workflows that bind together multiple steps of the research process, (c) energy considerations, (d) active versus passive reproducibility, (e) reproducibility and provenance as two sides of the same coin.
|
2026-05-19T09:04:00.070Z
| |||
|
Some specific aspects discussed at Reproducibility Table R4: (a) continuity of research in the context of (a.1) humans moving in and out or (a.2) technology/ other context(s) changing, (b) reproducibility of processes that have non-open components versus those that don't, (c) potential for collisions between research needs and business models, (d) the scale(s) of reproducibility and the granularity of provenance, (e) provenance-centric concepts like object biographies.
|
2026-05-19T09:01:17.628Z
| |||
|
A nanopublication consists of three main parts: (1) an assertion, (2) information on the provenance of the assertion, (3) bibliographic metadata about the nanopublication itself.
|
2026-05-19T07:04:18.324Z
| |||
|
An example for a piece of scientific information that is not formatted as a nanopublication but structurally similar.
|
2026-05-19T07:00:52.379Z
| |||
|
A set of example nanopublications
|
2026-05-19T06:51:31.022Z
| |||