Donat points to the preprint "The Biodiversity Libroscope: A Community roadmap to liberate and mobilize knowledge from scientific publications" that provides more details on the Disentis Roadmap, including information on short-term, medium-term and long-term time horizons.

Donat mentions "Digitally native species are a necessary shift in taxonomic practice"

Donat mentions the idea of a Libroscope - just like a telescope facilitates studying specific features of the sky, the libroscope is to assist with studying what is contained in the published scholarly record.

Next up is Donat Agosti with "The Disentis Roadmap: a decadal roadmap for liberating global biodiversity knowledge from scientific literature", which builds on and extends the data sharing efforts by the Bouchout Declaration

Laurence mentions that the average age of references cited in her journal is about 50 years, which is another reason why the Journal Impact Factor (which uses a 2-year window) is essentially useless in biodiversity research.

Next up: Laurence Bénichou with "The value of data imprisoned in biodiversity literature seen through data portals and dashboards".

Next up was Alexandra Korcheva with "From FAIR Data to FAIR Policy: Strengthening the Biodiversity Science-Policy Interface through Open Science", stressing that knowledge needs to be made actionable.

Next up is my talk (with JJ Dearborn) on "Wikimedia as a Platform for Evidence Synthesis: Quantifying Bias and Literature Coverage in Crowd-Sourced Knowledge Graphs"

Rainer also quotes Joanna Maciejewska on “I want AI to do my laundry and dishes so that I can do art and writing, not for AI to do my art and writing so that I can do my laundry and dishes.”

Rainer also mentions The IPBES Code of Practice on the Use of Artificial Intelligence.