| item | description | spaces | link | creator | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
I can report on some ongoing Nanodash developments: Trust&Spaces as queries; presets; about pages; ...
|
|
|
| item | description | spaces | link | creator | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ELIXIR BioHackathon Europe 2026 - Accepted: Project 3: Developing Open Standards for a Semantic Framework in Plant Specialized Metabolism
|
|
||||
|
MAC FDT v2 catalogue cleanup pass closed (PR #5). 48 nanopub operations on the live NSN across 5 commits: 3 upstream /-form v2 re-mints (Project + 2 Datasets), 3 retractions of #-form defectives produced by nanopub-py 2.0.1 (separator defect; switched signer to nanopub-java 1.88.0), 38 Stage 3 v2 instance mints, 4 Stage 4 v2 mints (Alpha knowlet view set). SPARQL on /repo/full confirms full supersession chain. FDT paper v1.0 consolidated on sibling branch (target venue updated to Digital Twin, Taylor & Francis). Tobias second-PR addendum draft (4 operational findings on the nanopub-skill experience) ready for review.
|
|
| text | link | user | date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Maybe we should have a nanopub-focused hackathon before the ELIXIR one.
|
|
|||
|
For hackathons, the project pitches and showcases can probably be represented by nanopubs in the dedicated space for the event.
|
|
|||
|
I think it would be nice if we could set up a dedicated space for use cases, so as to make it easier for newcomers to find out who is using nanopublications for what purposes.
|
|
|||
|
Great to hear Elena's Biohackathon proposal was accepted. I was wondering whether nanopubs will be involved? :)
|
|